Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask.
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.51.0302031035300.368@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_hba.conf hostmask. (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Yes, some have asked about this. My understanding was that CIDR > (host/len) was mostly for networks, while hostname/mask was for hosts. > Now, you can specify hosts using /32, but is is unusual? Maybe not. Typically, if you have something like an access list where you're specifying hosts or networks, you default the netmask to /32 if it's not supplied. However, if we're going to maintain backward compatability with the old format (i.e., using a separately specified netmask in the next column if no slash is present in the address column) we can't do that. Personally, I'm all for breaking backwards compatability (as I usually am :-)) but could quite easily live with specifying all most hosts as "n.n.n.n/32" forever into the future, too. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're alllight. --XTC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: