Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.51.0302011459350.610@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Curtis Faith writes: > > > a) Running as a service is important as this the way NT/2000 > > administrators manage server tasks. The fact that PostgreSQL's Cygwin > > emulation doesn't do this is very indicative of inferior Windows > > support. > > No, it is indicative of the inability to read the documentation. > PostgreSQL on Cygwin runs as a service if and only if you ask it to. I would say that not supporting those who have an inability to read documentation would count as "inferior Windows support." :-) What I'm hearing here is that all we really need to do to "compete" with MySQL on Windows is to make the UI a bit slicker. So what's the problem with someone building, for each release, a set of appropriate binaries, and someone making a slick install program that will install postgres, install parts of cygwin if necessary, and set up postgres as a service? cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're alllight. --XTC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: