Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New
От | Ricardo Ryoiti S. Junior |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0212110903190.27069-100000@unix-svr01.interno обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: Urgent need of (paid) PostgreSQL support in New
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > OS caching is generally considered a waste of resource in databases. > > Try to allocate as much as possible to shared buffers and set OS > > caching to minimum. > > That is an exactly opposite of the truth. Leave as much for OS cache and > do minimum use of shared buffers. > > Initially upping the shared buffers help but at some pointthe advantage starts > to disappear. Decide that figure with trial and error but certainly it will be > around 100-200MB for most cases.. Are there any studies around this? I remember that there where other people saying the same thing. But at least logically, it seems that the database server should know better than the OS what it needs cached or not. Also, doesn't the db buffer cache requires a bit lower "overload" for data to be accessed? []'s Ricardo.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: