Re: Large databases, performance
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large databases, performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0210071124410.443-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large databases, performance ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, performance)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Well, we were comparing ext3 v/s reiserfs. I don't remember the journalling > mode of ext3 but we did a 10 GB write test. Besides converting the RAID to RAID- > 0 from RAID-5 might have something to do about it. That will have a massive, massive effect on performance. Depending on your RAID subsystem, you can except RAID-0 to be between two and twenty times as fast for writes as RAID-5. If you compared one filesystem on RAID-5 and another on RAID-0, your results are likely not at all indicative of file system performance. Note that I've redirected followups to the pgsql-performance list. Avoiding cross-posting would be nice, since I am getting lots of duplicate messages these days. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: