Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0209251005330.9181-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Jan Wieck wrote: > And AFAICS it is scary only because screwing that up will simply corrupt > your database. Thus, a simple random number (okay, and a timestamp of > initdb) in two files, one in $PGDATA and one in $PGXLOG would be a > totally sufficient safety mechanism to prevent starting with the wrong > XLOG directory. But still, why set up a situation where your database might not start? Why not set it up so that if you get just *one* environment or command-line variable right, you can't set another inconsistently and screw up your start anyway? Why store configuration information outside of the database data directory in a form that's not easily backed up, and not easily found by other utilities? It's almost like people *don't* want to put this in the config file or something.... cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're alllight. --XTC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: