Re: Fw: OID
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fw: OID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0208192349320.432-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fw: OID ("Jules Alberts" <jules.alberts@arbodienst-limburg.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fw: OID
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Jules Alberts wrote: > Is there any consensus aboit avoiding OIDs? I'm running a small test > system right now using OIDs as a means to refer to BLOBs. Should I > expect any trouble using OIDs in our future production system? I don't know if there's a consensus, but I certainly avoid using OIDs completely in my own tables. They're can wrap, for a start, so in a really busy, large database you might end up getting one that you already have. Also, I don't like "hidden" fields; if I'm going to refer to soemething, I like it to be nice and obvious what's being referred to. And of course they're not portable. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: