Re: ProstGreSQL on RAID Question
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ProstGreSQL on RAID Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0208171530150.472-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ProstGreSQL on RAID Question (Chris Ruprecht <chrup@earthlink.net>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Chris Ruprecht wrote: > Thanks Curt - yes, I have the log files on a different drive all > together. I was thinking more along the lines of OS block size (4 KB) > vs. Postgres block size (8 KB by default) vs. RAID block size (32 KB). > Is there anything I should change? The RAID stripe size is not a big deal; generally you want to keep it smallish to maximize the number of outstanding requests you can service at the same time, but I find more often that it's the raid controller limiting me on this point. OS block size might as well be the same as postgresql block size; making it smaller just increases the chances that a block you need will only be "half" in the cache, and thus require a disk read anyway. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: