Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?)
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207181129280.681-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> writes: > > Remaining question: if OIDs are optional for normal tables, why are they > > created per default? Mandated by SQL? Backward compatibility? > > Backward compatibility. The SQL spec has no concept of OIDs at all. I have grave doubts as to how practical this would be, but what you do think of just getting rid of OIDs entirely? How hard would this be to implement? How many applications would it really affect? It seems a bit unclean to me to have this special OID mechanism doing something that standard SQL/relational mechanisms already do just fine. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: