Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207161758150.465-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > (In related news, how about filling up the oid/relfilenode numbers with > > zeros on the left, so a directory listing would reflect the numerical > > order?) > > Problem there is that we increase the size of much of the directory > lookups. Not sure if it is worth worrying about. Probably not such a big deal, since most systems will be reading a full block (8K or 16K under *BSD) to load the directory information anyway. Doing it in hex would give you only 8-char filenames, anyway. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're alllight. --XTC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: