Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207131908540.454-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL (Elaine Lindelef <eel@cognitivity.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Elaine Lindelef wrote: > Yes, there are points to quibble on, but overall, I thought it was a > decent article that exposed people to the idea of using PostgreSQL. Well, yeah, but it's really time to kill, properly, this idea that postgres is always slower than mysql. I'm reasonably convinced that under fairly heavy OLTP loads with some large queries going, MySQL would grind to a halt at loads much less than postgres can handle. The only area I know of where MySQL is noticably faster is when dealing with large amounts of data in tables with very short rows; MySQL has much less row overhead, so of course it's faster. Though people are working on reducing postgres' row overhead as well, which will help.... cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: