Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207121650160.436-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MySQL vs. PostgreSQL (sarah.fraser@cnet.com (builder)) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10 Jul 2002, builder wrote: > Which is better, PostgreSQL or MySQL? Both are excellent products with > unique strengths, and the choice is often a matter of personal > preference. Read on for a useful comparison of these two open source > database systems. > http://builder.com.com/article.jhtml?id=u00320020624gcn01.htm For some definition of "useful." You say in your table that postgres is slower. How did you measure this? Not many Web developers use PostgreSQL because they feel that the additional features degrade performance. Why developers should feel that features such as MVCC will degrade performance, I have no idea. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: