Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.44.0207120935020.436-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from
Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote: > Actually performance went down. Way down. I disagree with your > argument that increasing the cache will help, since the cache is not > needed if you don't pushd out your SHM pages in the first place and > need to reload them quickly. Ah, so your entire working data set can fit into your shared memory? In that case, yes, you are better off not decreasing it. I guess we should add a note to the FAQ for people using very small databases.... cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: