Re: Buffer Management
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buffer Management |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.43.0206252239230.670-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buffer Management (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buffer Management
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
So, while we're at it, what's the current state of people's thinking on using mmap rather than shared memory for data file buffers? I see some pretty powerful advantages to this approach, and I'm not (yet :-)) convinced that the disadvantages are as bad as people think. I think I can address most of the concerns in doc/TODO.detail/mmap. Is this worth pursuing a bit? (I.e., should I spend an hour or two writing up the advantages and thoughts on how to get around the problems?) Anybody got objections that aren't in doc/TODO.detail/mmap? cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're alllight. --XTC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: