Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support
От | Bill Studenmund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.33.0111151917220.2523-100000@vespasia.home-net.internetconnect.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bill Studenmund writes: > > > There is another test we can do. There is a variable which contains the > > Heimdal version number, '__heimdal_version'. If that symbol is present, > > then we have Heimdal, and if it's not, we have MIT. > > We're not interested in whether it's Heimdal or MIT, we're only interested > in whether that certain struct member is present and the set of libraries > needed to get at the functions we want. The latter can be done with > AC_SEARCH_LIBS, and if you look into krb5 first you might get all those > other libraries for free depending on the platform. Checking for struct > members can be done with a compilation test in the style of > config/c-library.m4. (Basically, you just check if the code you want to > use compiles. That's always a good start for a configure check, lacking > other ideas.) The problem I had with AC_SEARCH_LIBS was that if I don't add all of the libraries (-lasn1 -lroken etc.) the test program won't compile, even though the .o compiles fine. Can we make the test only depend on generating a .o? > I don't know if you want to sell this as a bug fix for 7.2. If you are > then I can work out a "good" patch for this in the next two days for you > to test. I'd like to make it a bug fix for 7.2 if we can, so I'd appreciate the help. I can test any new versions of the patch. :-) Oh, I'll be out of town from Nov 19 through the 24th, and I have intermittent weekend EMail, so please understand if I am less than responsive in those time windows. :-) Take care, Bill
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: