Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues.
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.3.96.980109173733.311V-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues. (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Disk block size issues.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Other stuff... > > > > Could the block size be made into a command line option, like "-k 8192"? > > Too scary for me. I kinda like this one...if it can be relatively implimented. The main reason I like it is that, like -B and -S, it means that someone could deal with "tweaking" a system without having to recompile from scratch... That said, I'd much rather that -k option being something that is an option only available when *creating* the database (ie. initdb) with a pg_blocksize file being created and checked when postmaster starts up. Essentially, make '-k 8192' an option only available to the postgres process, not the postmaster process. And not settable by the -O option to postmaster... > Yes, we could do that, but if they ever start the postmaster with a > different value, he is lost. See above...it should only be something that is settable at initdb time, not accessible via 'postmaster' itself... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: