Re: [HACKERS] database size
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] database size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.3.96.980106203122.254f-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] database size (darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] database size
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Darren King wrote: > 48 bytes + each row header (on my aix box..._your_ mileage may vary) > 8 bytes + two int fields @ 4 bytes each > 4 bytes + pointer on page to tuple > -------- = > 60 bytes per tuple > > 8192 / 60 give 136 tuples per page. > > 300000 / 136 ... round up ... need 2206 pages which gives us ... > > 2206 * 8192 = 18,071,532 > > So 19 MB is about right. And this is the best to be done, unless > you can make do with int2s which would optimally shrink the table > size to 16,834,560 bytes. Any nulls in there might add a few bytes > per offending row too, but other than that, this should be considered > normal postgresql behavior. Bruce...this would be *great* to have in the FAQ!! What we do need is a section of the User Manual dealing with computing resources required for a table, similar to this :) Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: