Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > > > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > > > Do we disable it?
> > > > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > > > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
> > >
> > > Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> > > warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> > > before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> > > questions list...
> >
> >     I liked the one suggestion about having it as a compile time
> > option until its fixed...
>
> How about an elog(NOTICE,"...") so it runs, but they see the NOTICE
> every time.

    That works too...but how does something like that work from within
a C program?  Or Perl?