Re: [HACKERS] attlen weirdness?

Bruce?  Guys?  Any word on this one?  I *thought* I remembered reading
soething about the 'attlen' becoming -1, but just checked the mailing list
archives and couldn't find anything :(

Thanks...

On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Julia A.Case wrote:

> I am using the following info to migrate a table from 6.2.1 to 6.3
>
> \connect template1
> drop database magecal;
> create database magecal;
> \connect magecal
> \connect - julie
> CREATE TABLE dates (id int4, date char(10), news char(1024)) archive = none;
> COPY dates FROM stdin;
> 1    1998Jan16    <H3>Calendar Created</H3>







                               ! 
> !
> !
>
> \.
> CREATE  INDEX dates_indx on dates using btree ( id int4_ops, date bpchar_ops );
>
>
> now if I connect to the database and do
>
> select attlen from pg_attribute where attname='news';
>
> I get
> -1
>
> This doesn't seem quite right.
>
> Julie
>
> --
> [  Julia Anne Case  ] [        Ships are safe inside the harbor,       ]
> [Programmer at large] [      but is that what ships are really for.    ]
> [   Admining Linux  ] [           To thine own self be true.           ]
> [ Windows/WindowsNT ] [ Fair is where you take your cows to be judged. ]
>