Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.3.95.980306123258.26524P-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > I've dumped a 6.1 database using the pg_dumpall from 6.3 to load into > > 6.3. > > > > The format of the data to be copied into pg_user is wrong - there are > > not enough columns. I guess this may be a problem from having skipped > > out 6.2, but it would be nice if it worked properly :-) > > > > Also one of the column names I had used in my old database is no longer > > allowed ('local'). Again, it would be nice if pg_dumpall could spot > > no-longer allowed column names and warn the user rather than having > > psql crash when one tries to import the data and then having to trace > > back to where the problem was... > > Yikes, we never changed pg_user to pg_shadow in pg_dumpall. Isn't that > the real problem. Need to have that patched, or people will not be able > to upgrade. Applying patch now. > > Do I put this patch in the patches directory? Yes...Neil, can you put a "patches page" up on the WWW site, linked to the main page, that lists the patches as well as a short description of what each one does? Bruce, can you get me a patch for this? I'm going to review the patches that I do have now, and the ones that look perfectly safe (ie. I have no doubt about), will get included on the CD rom also...not as part of the source, just as a seperate file to be used...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: