Re: [HACKERS] postgres initdb on ALPHA/Digital Unix
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] postgres initdb on ALPHA/Digital Unix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.3.95.980213081722.29282F-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] postgres initdb on ALPHA/Digital Unix (Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] postgres initdb on ALPHA/Digital Unix
Re: [HACKERS] postgres initdb on ALPHA/Digital Unix |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Maarten Boekhold wrote: > > > I have already posted this problem to the pgsql-ports mailing list, > > > but it is less that totally evident from our remote location what is > > > the best strategy, so I await developments here on 64 bit issues with > > > interest. > > > Hell, if it helps any, I'll do the manual aspect of this if > > someone wants to give me access to their machine, and try to work with > > Bruce on this *shrug* > > Does this problem only appear on ALPHA machines or also on other 64 bit > architectures? I might be able to find a 64 bit machine on my university > on which I can do a compile/initdb/gdb run if that helps.... We just also had a report from one Dec ALPHA user that he's been using PostgreSQL since the v6.0 days with no problems...most curious... > sparc stations 20 are 32 bits aren't they? Then that machine does not > qualify. We are getting an ultra-sparc soon though, and there might be > some alpha's around. I hate to sound stupid, but an Ultra1...that's a 64bit machine? If so, then I too have been running it on a 64bit machine, with absolutely no problems, for almost 6 months now...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: