Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.3.95.980203100423.14960O-100000@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question abou
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Andrew Martin wrote: > > > > > I'll say it again and again - glibc-2.0 is the _STANDARD_ (actually > > > > > reference) platform for Unix. All Unix. Not just Linux. > > > > > Adopted last year. > > > > > > > > And...how many Unix (other then Linux) are *actually* using it? > > > > Any idea on how we can test whether it is being used or not? > > > > > > AFAIK some BSD's are now using it - but I am probably wrong. I gave up on > > > BSD in '92. > > > > Geez, about the time I gave up on Linux and converted to *BSD > > *grin* > > > No wonder you're so anti-Linux if you stopped using it in '92. I started with > 0.99pl13 in November '93. It must have been around v0.2 in '92 and of course > it wasn't stable then.... Checking now...oops, you are right: Record created on 03-Jun-93. That was when we created the DNS record for my first company, which ran 2/3rds on Linux...so whatever version existed back there. In Linux's favor here, though...even at that point, if you ran Linux on a *non-networked* system (ie. we had some dialup lines into it, but not networking)...that thing ran pretty much rock-solid. It wasn't until we actually put some load on her that she wouldn't run for more then a day or so at a time...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: