Re: knngist patch support
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: knngist patch support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.1002111805210.16860@sn.sai.msu.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: knngist patch support (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: knngist patch support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote: >>> version I saw hadn't any documentation whatever. It's not committable >>> on documentation grounds alone, even if everybody was satisfied about >>> the code. >> >> well, there is enough documentation to review patch. > > Where is there any documentation at all? There are no changes to doc/ > at all; no README; and not even a lengthy comment block anywhere that > I saw. Nor did the email in which the patch was submitted clearly lay > out the design of the feature. Well, initial knngist announce http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg01547.php isn't enough to review ? We made test data available to reproduce results, see http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-11-25 We are here and open to any reviewer's question. > >> In my understanding >> this was always enough to submit code. User's documentation is depend on >> discussion and review and can be added later >> before releasing beta. > > Several people have said this lately, but it doesn't match what I've > seen of our practice over the last year and a half; Tom regularly > boots patches that lack documentation (or necessary regression test > updates). Sure, people often submit small patches without > documentation thinking to fill it in later, but anything major pretty > much has to have it, AFAICS. From my own point of view, I would never > commit anything that lacked documentation, for fear of being asked to > write it myself if the patch author didn't. Of course it's a bit > different for committers, who can presumably be counted on to clean up > their own mess, but I still think it's fair to expect at least some > effort to be put into the docs before commit. I think nobody will spend his time to write sgml code for user's documentation for fear his patch will be rejected/moved/getting rewritten, so his time will be just wasted. Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: