Re: very long update gin index troubles back?
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: very long update gin index troubles back? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0901282337330.9554@sn.sai.msu.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: very long update gin index troubles back? (Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: very long update gin index troubles back?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:45:53 +0300 > Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote: > >>> No matter if I drop the trigger that update agg content and the >>> fact that I'm just updating d, postgresql will update the index? >> Yes, due to MVCC. Update of row could produce new version (tuple) >> and new version should be index as old one. > > Does that mean that it could be a good choice to place the tsvector > in another table? this is a trade-off - additional join Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: