Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0806261705280.4085@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Vivek Khera wrote: >> Anyone have experience with IDE, SATA, or SAS-connected flash devices like >> the Samsung MCBQE32G5MPP-0VA? I mean, it seems lovely - 32GB, at a transfer >> rate of 100MB/s, and doesn't degrade much in performance when writing small >> random blocks. But what's it actually like, and is it reliable? > > None of these manufacturers rates these drives for massive amounts of writes. > They're sold as suitable for laptop/desktop use, which normally is not a > heavy wear and tear operation like a DB. Once they claim suitability for > this purpose, be sure that I and a lot of others will dive into it to see how > well it really works. Until then, it will just be an expensive brick-making > experiment, I'm sure. It claims a MTBF of 2,000,000 hours, but no further reliability information seems forthcoming. I thought the idea that flash couldn't cope with many writes was no longer true these days? Matthew -- I work for an investment bank. I have dealt with code written by stock exchanges. I have seen how the computer systems that store your money are run. If I ever make a fortune, I will store it in gold bullion under my bed. -- Matthew Crosby
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: