Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
| От | david@lang.hm |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0712261536440.11785@asgard.lang.hm обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 (Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Mark Mielke wrote: > david@lang.hm wrote: >> I could see a raid 1 array not doing consistancy checking (after all, it >> has no way of knowing what's right if it finds an error), but since raid >> 5/6 can repair the data I would expect them to do the checking each time. > Your messages are spread across the thread. :-) > > RAID 5 cannot repair the data. I don't know much about RAID 6, but I expect > it cannot necessarily repair the data either. It still doesn't know which > drive is wrong. In any case, there is no implementation I am aware of that > performs mandatory consistency checks on read. This would be silliness. sorry, raid 5 can repair data if it knows which chunk is bad (the same way it can rebuild a drive). Raid 6 does something slightly different for it's parity, I know it can recover from two drives going bad, but I haven't looked into the question of it detecting bad data. David Lang
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: