Re: EAV or not to EAV?
| От | Oleg Bartunov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: EAV or not to EAV? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0711221356470.17908@sn.sai.msu.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | EAV or not to EAV? (Reg Me Please <regmeplease@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
backup of postgres scheduled with cron
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Reg Me Please wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have to take into account the update history of every single
> field into a number of tables.
> Those updates can come to the future (next values) but also to the
> past (history fix) and apply only to some fields, usually not to the
> entire record.
> Every lookup in those tables is always related to a timestamp that
> normally is the current timestamp, but can also be a past timestamp.
>
> I've come up with a "traditionally regretted" EAV design with the add of
> timestamps for the history. And the related problems, some of which have
> been solved by Joe Conways's crosstab contrib.
>
> Is there a better idea than mine? I hope so.
We use contrib/hstore for this
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: