Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0706252037070.8775@briare.cri.ensmp.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Tom, >> That would break existing Makefiles that use the "please take the first >> pg_config in the path" feature, which rather make sense (it just means >> that you want the extension for your current postgresql). > > How would it break them? The default definition is still PG_CONFIG = > pg_config, this just moves where that definition appears. I think that I was answering to: ... Tom> I'm not sure though how to get this setting to Tom> override the one in Makefile.global ... Tom> or should we just remove that one? With the assumption that the above "that one" refered to the "PG_CONFIG" macro definition in "Makefile.global". As existing extension makefiles do not defined PG_CONFIG, relying on one would break them wrt future releases? That's why I suggested to replace the "Makefile.global" definition by a conditional one. But it is also entirely possible that I did not fully understand your sentence:-) -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: