Re: SCSI vs SATA
От | david@lang.hm |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061557200.17492@asgard.lang.hm обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, david@lang.hm wrote: > >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> >> > Based on experience I think that on average server drives are more >> > reliable than consumer grade drives, and can take more punishment. >> >> this I am not sure about > > I think they should survey Tivo owners next time. > > Perfect stress-testing environment. Mine runs at over 50C most of the time, > and it's writing 2 video streams 24/7. What more could you do to punish a > drive? :) and the drives that are in them are consumer IDE drives. I will admit that I've removed to cover from my tivo to allow it to run cooler, and I'm still on the origional drive + 100G drive I purchased way back when (7+ years ago) before I removed the cover I did have times when the tivo would die from the heat (Los Angeles area in the summer with no A/C) David Lang
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: