Re: Faster StrNCpy
От | Sergey E. Koposov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0610030011410.12197@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Faster StrNCpy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Faster StrNCpy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes: >> Just the test on IA64 (Itanium2, 1.6Ghz, 8Gb memory). The results seem to >> be quite different: > > What libc are you using exactly? Can you try it with the unrolled > strlcpy I posted? glibc 2.3.5 , gcc 3.4.4 my results were obtained already with your unrolled version (but when I first ran it with the 'default' strlcpy the results were the same). > > In glibc-2.4.90, there seem to be out-of-line assembly code > implementations of strncpy for: sparc64 sparc32 s390x s390 alpha ia64 > and an inlined assembler version for i386. So the x86_64 case is > nearly the only popular architecture that doesn't seem to have > a hand-hacked implementation ... which throws some doubt on Mark's and > my results as possibly not being very representative. Regards, Sergey ******************************************************************* Sergey E. Koposov Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute Tel: +49-6221-528-349 Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: