Re: basic stored proc/transaction question
От | Ben |
---|---|
Тема | Re: basic stored proc/transaction question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0603241026530.15001@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: basic stored proc/transaction question ("Ian Harding" <harding.ian@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Well, that's awesome. Thanks! On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Ian Harding wrote: > On 3/24/06, Ben <bench@silentmedia.com> wrote: >> My understanding is that a stored procedure does an implicit begin/commit when >> it executes. Maybe my brain isn't working so well this morning, because I can't >> figure out how I would do: >> >> begin; >> call stored proc; >> call another stored proc; >> commit; >> >> It seems that the transaction would be committed after the first call. >> > Nope. Unless you use the new SAVEPOINT stuff, the explicit > transaction is the transaction. Any error in any function will > rollback the whole thing. The commit happens at the explicit commit. > > Every SQL statement (such as calling a function) runs in an implicit > transaction. Explicit transactions effectively "group" these implicit > transactions such that any one failure causes them all to fail. > > - Ian >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: