Re: Cluster/redundancy question
От | Aly S.P Dharshi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cluster/redundancy question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0510131003450.15022@edtnas67.telus.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cluster/redundancy question (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cluster/redundancy question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Andrew, I disagree, I wouldn't want to contend with all the complexities and kludge of Oracle thank you very much. If there was a way to get PostgreSQL to do better than the current clustering methods, then why not, it would be a big win for us. PostgreSQL *is* an enterprise class DB after all, and we should be improving upon it to do so and remain so. Cheers, Aly. On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:38:22AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> >> Don't get me wrong, if replication is one of the things you need, then >> consider it, but if you're putting bad data into your database, what >> good is replicating it gonna do ya? > >But if real, ORAC-style clustering is what you need, buy Oracle. The >limitations on MySQL's implementation give me the willies. As Tom >Waits said, "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh >away." > >A > > -- Aly S.P Dharshi aly.dharshi@telus.net "A good speech is like a good dress that's short enough to be interesting and long enough to cover the subject"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: