Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Bundled ...
От | Devrim GUNDUZ |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Bundled ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.63.0510311624060.19678@mail.kivi.com.tr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Bundled ... ("Lamar Owen" <lowen@pari.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lamar, On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lamar Owen wrote: >> So thinking that: > >> * Beta and RC RPMs are used only by testers >> * We use the beta and RC steps to build the new RPM sets, so that means >> that actually they are not production quality looking from the RPM >> perspective. > > By way of clarification, as I am the one who wrote that portion of the > spec file, an 'RPM prerelease' and a 'beta' weren't intended to be the > same thing; the line in the spec referenced was for my own use to remind > me that my own internal testing packages (with a release number 0.x) > weren't intended for public consumption. Devrim, you can remove that > section of the spec file at any time at this point, because you are using > CVS for the purpose that I was using 'prerelease' RPMs. Ok, I've removed that part from the spec files. > Historically, beta and release candidate RPM's were put on the main ftp > site but flagged as beta quality. I certainly appreciate your dilligence > in following those instructions I wrote long ago, but, thanks to your > smoother release process (in no small part due to the use of CVS) those > instructions are obsolete. Many thanks for being that dilligent! :) Ok, I will be putting the beta and RC RPMs to FTP site from now on. Regards, - -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDZ9Is4zE8DGqpiZARAku+AJ90HZHQNUeLQ+a7zy7ge2hFvNpLegCgqD0U 2yf2pDfmsSGrZZDBWBf7yZU= =Wxyt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: