Re: two disks - best way to use them?
От | David Lang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: two disks - best way to use them? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.62.0512051950560.2807@qnivq.ynat.uz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: two disks - best way to use them? (Thomas Harold <tgh@tgharold.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: two disks - best way to use them?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Thomas Harold wrote: > Yeah, I don't think I was clear about the config. It's (4) disks setup as a > pair of RAID1 sets. My original config was pgsql on the first RAID set (data > and WAL). I'm now experimenting with putting the data/pg_xlog folder on the > 2nd set of disks. > > Under the old setup (everything on the original RAID1 set, in a dedicated > 32GB LVM volume), I was seeing 80-90% wait percentages in "top". My > understanding is that this is an indicator of an overloaded / bottlenecked > disk system. This was while doing massive inserts into a test table > (millions of narrow rows). I'm waiting to see what happens once I have > data/pg_xlog on the 2nd disk set. in that case you logicly have two disks, so see the post from Ron earlier in this thread. David Lang
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: