Re: postgresql shared buffers
От | Praveen Kumar N |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql shared buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.61.0609081954490.17163@students.iiit.ac.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql shared buffers (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql shared buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:22:19 +0100 > From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> > To: Praveen Kumar N <praveen_n@students.iiit.net> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql shared buffers > > Praveen Kumar N wrote: >> >> Following is the output of query i have executed. > > Looks like Alvaro guessed right. It reads both relations in sequence, sorts > them in temporary storage, outside bufmgr, and then does a merge join on the > sorted inputs. could you tell me how can we trace that? I mean which functions shall I checkout for that. > > If you want to see the behavior you expected, I think you need to define > indexes on a2 and b2, if you don't have them already, and coerce the planner > to choose a nested loop join. I'd suggest using "SET enable_seqscan=false; > SET enable_bitmapscan=false;" and see if that gets you a nested loop join. > > -- N Praveen Kumar Btech-IV CSE IIIT,Hyd AP,India Imagination is more important than knowledge... --Albert Einstein
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: