Re: Dumb shlib build rules cause regression test failures
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dumb shlib build rules cause regression test failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.61.0410240933590.5683@mordor.coelho.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Dumb shlib build rules cause regression test failures on ia64 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Tom, > The obvious solution to this is to use Makefile.shlib all the time, > but there's a problem: Makefile.shlib is only designed to build a single > shlib per build subdirectory, and contrib/spi wants to build several. > I don't see any easy way to rejigger Makefile.shlib to support multiple > shared libraries at once --- anyone see a way? > > A klugy workaround is to build all the modules in contrib/spi into a > single shared library. This is ugly but I can't level any worse charge > than "ugly" against it. If I just want one extension, I would like to load only that extension. So I'm really against an artificial "ugly" merge. But it seems ok to me if it is not artificial. > The other contrib modules build no more than one shared library apiece, > and could trivially be converted to the MODULE_big build path. Or more > likely, redefine the MODULES case in pgxs.mk to support only one module > in a directory, and use Makefile.shlib all the time. If the makefile needs a lot of work to build several shared libs, I would suggest to split contrib/spi and possibly others on a one shared lib per directory basis: contrib/spi_this, contrib/spi_that, contrib/spi_thing, and thus to rely on Makefile.shlib all the time as you suggest. Directories are cheap, and I don't think it is bad to separate different contributions clearly. On the other hand, if some distinct libs really belong together, then merge them. Just my very humble little opinion;-) Have a nice day, -- Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: