Re: NIC to NIC connection
От | Christian Fowler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NIC to NIC connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.61.0410191915480.21329@leda.steelsun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | NIC to NIC connection ("Kent Anderson" <kenta@ezyield.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
There have been many comments about this already Kent. My $.02: The most common practice I am aware of is to install 2 NIC's in each appserver - one to your load balancer, and one to your private network (192.168.*) where your database server sites. In fact, ideally your database machine has no publically addressable nic at all. I have personally dealt with such a setup in several installs, some doing of millions of page views per *day*, and it has always been very reliable, secure, and fast. Use gigabit everywhere on your 192.168 "database" network. If you are concernced about bandwidth, wire up http://www.mrtg.org and look at the traffic for yourself. getting postgres to use this setup should be a piece of cake. Just make sure your settings in pg_hba.conf are setup right. Good luck. On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Kent Anderson wrote: > We are upgrading our servers and have run into an interesting situation. It > has been proposed that we have a direct connection from the web servers to > the postgres server via extra NICs. Has anyone done this before and how big > a project would it be to alter ASP and Java applications to make use of such > a connection? > > Before we even waste time installing the NIC's I would like a sense of how > hard it is to get postgres to use that kind of a connection vs over the > Internet. We are looking to increase communication speed between the web > servers and database server as much as possible. > > Thanks > Kent Anderson > [ \ / [ >X< Christian Fowler | spider@viovio.com [ / \ http://www.viovio.com | http://www.tikipro.org
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: