Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
От | Devrim GUNDUZ |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Which platfform do you recommend? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.61.0410130101060.21959@emo.org.tr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Which platfform do you recommend? (nd02tsk@student.hig.se) |
Ответы |
Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 nd02tsk@student.hig.se wrote: > I am wondering which plattform PostgreSQL performs best under? > I am doing a comparison with MySQL which, according to their manual, runs > best under Linux 2.4 with ReiserFS on x86. Reiserfs runs better if you have files that have small sizes. So MySQL could run better on reiser; since it is a "small" database ;-) As far as I've tried, Red Hat family (RHEL, FC X ) and FreeBSD are the optimal OSes. For Linux, ext3 seems better, but under some circumstances ext2 could run more stable. Check pgsql-perform list archives for more discussions on filesystems on Linux. Umm... I've been testing PostgreSQL on Linxu 2.6.X for a long time under heavy load. I don't have the benchmarks, but I can say that many things runs faster and faster on 2.6 than 2.4. - -HTH - -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBbFz5tl86P3SPfQ4RAkNIAJ9Is8fd3HaprAx3b/o1aVVEQEkBvwCeJ/Q0 vu/3P6AavTQvOgIe848JrF8= =DISv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: