Re: pg_get_domaindef
От | Gavin Sherry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0701251713450.1192@linuxworld.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_get_domaindef (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> ... convincing use-case that will justify the maintenance load we > >> are setting up for ourselves. "Somebody might want this" is not > >> adequate. > > > I realize it is problem to have the function in two places in our code, > > but if we don't make a user-accessible version, every application has to > > roll their own version and update it for our system catalog changes. > > Nope, wrong, you are assuming the conclusion. Exactly which apps have > to have this? Well, the alternative interfaces like pgadmin and ppa. That said, I prefer the idea of breaking out the queries in pg_dump and psql into a library. Like you say up thread, that's a big project and it's an all or nothing proposition. Thanks, Gavin
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: