Re: This is our slashdot coverage?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gavin Sherry
Тема Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0612081345040.29385@linuxworld.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: This is our slashdot coverage?  ("Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael.Carneholm@WirelessCar.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Mikael Carneholm wrote:

> >
> > And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-)
> >
>
> Interesting. Which functions are you planning on implementing, more
> specifically? (Personally, I have had great use of FIRST/LAST,
> RANK/DENSE_RANK and LAG/LEAD)

Interestingly, FIRST, LAST, LAG and LEAD are absent from the spec but
everyone I've spoken to has said they're close to being the most useful
:-). So, I'm aiming to do those as well.

Implemenenting the actual functions is trivial compared to implementing
the window construct in the executor (and planner).

Gavin

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Mayer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?