Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
| От | Gavin Sherry |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0612071503040.20822@linuxworld.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Luke Lonergan wrote: > Josh, > > On 12/5/06 7:17 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > > Depends. Read it another way, it implies that the only reason we're not > > better than DB2 and Oracle in every way is the lack of windowing > > functions. Wouldn't that be nice? > > And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-) > Yep! The mention of window functions is weird though. DB2 does not support window functions AFAIK. Oracle is the only all purpose database that does. Gavin
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: