Re: This is our slashdot coverage?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gavin Sherry
Тема Re: This is our slashdot coverage?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0612071503040.20822@linuxworld.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: This is our slashdot coverage?  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Ответы Re: This is our slashdot coverage?  ("Dan Scott" <denials@gmail.com>)
Re: This is our slashdot coverage?  (Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Luke Lonergan wrote:

> Josh,
>
> On 12/5/06 7:17 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
> > Depends.  Read it another way, it implies that the only reason we're not
> > better than DB2 and Oracle in every way is the lack of windowing
> > functions.   Wouldn't that be nice?
>
> And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-)
>

Yep!

The mention of window functions is weird though. DB2 does not support
window functions AFAIK. Oracle is the only all purpose database that does.

Gavin

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ewald Geschwinde
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Coverage of 8.2 Release
Следующее
От: "Dan Scott"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: This is our slashdot coverage?