Re: EINTR error in SunOS
От | Qingqing Zhou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EINTR error in SunOS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0601011354500.14558@eon.cs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EINTR error in SunOS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes: > > I understand put a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the retry-loop may make more > > graceful stop, but it won't work in some cases -- notice that the io > > routines we will patch can be used before the signal mechanism is setup. > > I don't think it will help much at all: too many of the operations in > question are invoked in places where CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS is a no-op. > Examples: > * disk writes are mostly done by the bgwriter and not backends at all > * unlinks are generally done during xact commit/rollback > Right. > Qingqing's point about failures in system()-invoked commands (think > archive_command for PITR) is a mighty good one too. That puts a > serious crimp into any illusion that we can really fix this in any > reliable way. > Not my credit, I just collect Rod & Greg's posts about this here :-) And I still not sure what exactly the problem we want to fix here -- think our target is the "operation should not faild because of EINTR". Regards, Qingqing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: