On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I had forgotten that the original patch allowed that. Personally I'd
> > vote for taking it out, for the above-stated reasons --- any objections?
>
> I vote for taking it out.
Pull it. I added it intentionally but now I'm questioning my reasoning
(which was, sequences might be accessed lots, people might want to put
them somewhere intentionally).
>
> Chris
>
>
> !DSPAM:40f1f2de259842510072165!
>
>