Re: Point in Time Recovery
От | spock@mgnet.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0407061250040.14377@spock.intra.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Point in Time Recovery ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > Should we use a different datatype than time_t for the commit timestamp, > > one that offers more fine grained differentiation between checkpoints? > > Imho seconds is really sufficient. If you know a more precise position > you will probably know it from backend log or an xlog sniffer. With those > you can easily use the TransactionId way. I'd also think that seconds are absolutely sufficient. From my daily experience I can say that you're normally lucky to know the time on one minute basis. If you need to get closer, a log sniffer is unavoidable ... Greetings, Klaus -- Full Name : Klaus Naumann | (http://www.mgnet.de/) (Germany) Phone / FAX : ++49/177/7862964 | E-Mail: (kn@mgnet.de)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: