Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0406101100130.23525@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dear Bruce, > > So maybe the following TODO could be kept: > > - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard > > > > I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be > > welcome just to check that nothing is broken. > > Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item > that is only possible. Sorry, I do not understand your argument, what you mean by "only possible". Or are you talking about roles?? I see TODO items as wishes, and I'm not sure I can see what is wrong with wishing better/full testing of postgresql data access controls and compare the results with what is defined by the norm? -- Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: