Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.56.0308191013170.4847@krusty.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inconsistencies in our SGML output (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane writes: > Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference, > <xref linkend="reference"> > renders as "Part VI" here: > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html > and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation": > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html > Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems > overly verbose to me. Apparently, there is a bug in the stylesheets. I'm looking at it. > Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql > chapter, > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html > Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1? It seems to be made > with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections. The stylesheets deliberately don't make a TOC for a particular level if it would consist of just one entry. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: