Re: PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.56.0307242247380.5602@krusty.credativ.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2] (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Larry Rosenman writes: > Universal Practice does NOT equal Security and Usability. > > Please consider what Kean is saying here. What Kean is saying is that your system is insecure if you have a setuid executable that references shared libraries with nonabsolute sonames and you have a system (an "older system") that contains a particular bug in its run-time dynamic loader that it obeys LD_LIBRARY_PATH for setuid executables. That is fairly common knowledge, and that's why LD_LIBRARY_PATH is ignored for setuid executables on all properly functioning operating systems. If your system is broken in that particular way, upgrade your system or don't use setuid programs at all. Those are the only sane choices. It is not an acceptable choice to disable all valid uses of nonabsolute sonames for all users, just because some users are running on broken systems with obvious security flaws. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: