Re: Big databases vs small databases
От | Wim |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big databases vs small databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.53.0402180848540.5928@tyr.car.belbone.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Big databases vs small databases ("Sugrue, Sean" <Sean.Sugrue@analog.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi Sean, It depends on how your table is build. If it is a table without indexes and constraints, it doesn't matter how big your DB is. It also depends on how you insert them: an insert takes longer than a copy and if you use insert it takes longer if you have autocommit enabled. I have tables that I fill with the copy command. Those tables contain more than 160 million records and it still goes quite fast. I hope that I'm right, because these are only thoughts. I didn't perform any tests. The specialists may correct me if I'm wrong :-) If I'm right, it was my pleasure to help you :-) Cheers! Wim On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Sugrue, Sean wrote: > Stupid question. Does it take longer to add records to a large database as oppose to a smaller one? > Intuitively I would think so, but I just don't know reason. Has anyone performed any tests to find out > if its a linear relationship or does it go up exponentially? > > > > > >
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: