Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org
От | Logan Bowers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.53.0303170059580.8767@neo.magick.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org (Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
I don't know what your definition of "high" is, but I do find that turnover can degrade performance over time. Perhaps one of the devs can enlighten me, but I have a database that turns over ~100,000 rows/day that does appear to slowly get worse. The updates are done in batches and I "VACUUM" and "VACUUM ANALYZE" after each batch (three/day) but I found that over time simple queries would start to hit the disk more and more. A "select count(*) FROM tblwordidx" initially took about 1 second to return a count of 2 million but after a few months it took several minutes of really hard HDD grinding. Also, the database only had a couple hundred megs of data in it, but the db was taking up 8-9 GB of disk space. I'm thinking data fragmentation is ruining cache performance? When I did a dump restore and updated from 7.2.1 to 7.3.1 queries were zippy again. But, now it is starting to slow... I have yet to measure the effects of a VACUUM FULL, however. I'll try it an report back... Logan Bowers On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Aaron Krowne wrote: <snip> > I've done it here and there, especially when things seem slow. Never > seems to help much; the data turnover isn't high. > <snip>
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: