Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
От | Yury Bokhoncovich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0210021431310.17945-100000@panda.center-f1.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello! On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > It is not clear to me; is this its own transaction or a function call? BTW. As reported by my friend: Oracle 8.1.7 (ver.9 behaves the same way): --- cut --- SQL> SET TRANSACTION READ WRITE; Transaction set. SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') FROM DUAL; TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM ------------------- 02-10-2002 10:04:19 SQL> -- wait a lot SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') FROM DUAL; TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM ------------------- 02-10-2002 10:04:27 SQL> COMMIT; Commit complete. --- cut --- > > > > > Any Oracle 9 users out there? > > > > > > > > > > I need this run: > > > > > > > > > > BEGIN; > > > > > SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; > > > > > -- wait 5 seconds > > > > > SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; > > > > > > > > > > Are those two timestamps the same? -- WBR, Yury Bokhoncovich, Senior System Administrator, NOC of F1 Group. Phone: +7 (3832) 106228, ext.140, E-mail: byg@center-f1.ru. Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: