Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> > Just how many incidents where people change the wrong files do you except. 
> > Maybe it's just easier to handle one such case every third year than to 
> > set up some system to prevent it.
> 
> The number of incidents isn't the issue, the fact that it could happen 
> at all is.
> 
> This isn't a web browser.

Du you have anything against browsers? :-)

> This is a system that companies, very - very big companies rely on. We
> must have a controlled, documented process for comitters.

And?

If you tell someone he/she is just allowed to commit in the pl/foo
subproject then that's probably more then enough. The nice thing with cvs
is that old things are not lost and all the commits are sent out on a
mailinglist. I don't see how this is any different just because some very
- very big companies are involved.

If it's easy to do, fine. I just don't see it as a very important thing.

Anyway. I think it's a good thing that postgresql do as little as possible
and stuff that can be handled separately are.

-- 
/Dennis Björklund